Egypt: “Dictators” do not Dictate, They Obey Orders
Egypt: “Dictators” do not Dictate, They Obey Orders
AfSD™(ADVOCATE FOR SAVING DOGS™and all living creatures)
Reposted with thanks by:
Martha
The Man Common (www.myspace.com/33891466)
Date: 30/01/2011 08:58:57
“Dictators” do not Dictate, They Obey Orders
The Protest Movement in Egypt: “Dictators” do not Dictate, They Obey Orders
The Mubarak regime could
collapse in the a face of a nationwide protest movement… What
prospects for Egypt and the Arab World?
collapse in the a face of a nationwide protest movement… What
prospects for Egypt and the Arab World?
“Dictators” do not dictate, they obey orders. This is true in Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria.
Dictators are invariably political puppets. Dictators do not decide.
President Hosni Mubarak was a faithful servant of Western economic interests and so was Ben Ali.
The national government is the object of the protest movement.
The objective is to unseat the puppet rather than the puppet-master.
The slogans in Egypt are “Down with Mubarak, Down with the Regime”.
No anti-American posters have been reported… The overriding and
destructive influence of the USA in Egypt and throughout the Middle East
remains unheralded.
The foreign powers which operate behind the scenes are shielded from the protest movement.
No
significant political change will occur unless the issue of foreign
interference is meaningfully addressed by the protest movement.
significant political change will occur unless the issue of foreign
interference is meaningfully addressed by the protest movement.
The
US embassy in Cairo is an important political entity, invariably
overshadowing the national government. The Embassy is not a target of
the protest movement.
US embassy in Cairo is an important political entity, invariably
overshadowing the national government. The Embassy is not a target of
the protest movement.
In
Egypt, a devastating IMF program was imposed in 1991 at the height of
the Gulf War. It was negotiated in exchange for the annulment of
Egypt’s multibillion dollar military debt to the US as well as its
participation in the war. The resulting deregulation of food prices,
sweeping privatisation and massive austerity measures led to the
impoverishment of the Egyptian population and the destabilization of
its economy. The Mubarak government was praised as a model “IMF pupil”.
Egypt, a devastating IMF program was imposed in 1991 at the height of
the Gulf War. It was negotiated in exchange for the annulment of
Egypt’s multibillion dollar military debt to the US as well as its
participation in the war. The resulting deregulation of food prices,
sweeping privatisation and massive austerity measures led to the
impoverishment of the Egyptian population and the destabilization of
its economy. The Mubarak government was praised as a model “IMF pupil”.
The
role of Ben Ali’s government in Tunisia was to enforce the IMF’s
deadly economic medicine, which over a period of more than twenty years
served to destabilize the national economy and impoverish the Tunisian
population. Over the last 23 years, economic and social policy in
Tunisia has been dictated by the Washington Consensus.
role of Ben Ali’s government in Tunisia was to enforce the IMF’s
deadly economic medicine, which over a period of more than twenty years
served to destabilize the national economy and impoverish the Tunisian
population. Over the last 23 years, economic and social policy in
Tunisia has been dictated by the Washington Consensus.
Both
Hosni Mubarak and Ben Ali stayed in power because their governments
obeyed and effectively enforced the diktats of the IMF.
Hosni Mubarak and Ben Ali stayed in power because their governments
obeyed and effectively enforced the diktats of the IMF.
From
Pinochet and Videla to Baby Doc, Ben Ali and Mubarak, dictators have
been installed by Washington. Historically in Latin America, dictators
were instated through a series of US sponsored military coups. In
todays World, they are installed through “free and fair elections”
under the surveillance of the “international community”.
Pinochet and Videla to Baby Doc, Ben Ali and Mubarak, dictators have
been installed by Washington. Historically in Latin America, dictators
were instated through a series of US sponsored military coups. In
todays World, they are installed through “free and fair elections”
under the surveillance of the “international community”.
Our message to the protest movement:
Actual
decisions are taken in Washington DC, at the US State Department, at
the Pentagon, at Langley, headquarters of the CIA. at H Street NW, the
headquarters of the World Bank and the IMF.
decisions are taken in Washington DC, at the US State Department, at
the Pentagon, at Langley, headquarters of the CIA. at H Street NW, the
headquarters of the World Bank and the IMF.
The
relationship of “the dictator” to foreign interests must be addressed.
Unseat the political puppets but do not forget to target the “real
dictators”.
relationship of “the dictator” to foreign interests must be addressed.
Unseat the political puppets but do not forget to target the “real
dictators”.
The
protest movement should focus on the real seat of political authority;
it should target the US embassy, the delegation of the European Union,
the national missions of the IMF and the World Bank.
protest movement should focus on the real seat of political authority;
it should target the US embassy, the delegation of the European Union,
the national missions of the IMF and the World Bank.
Meaningful political change can only be ensured if the neoliberal economic policy agenda is thrown out.
Regime Replacement
If
the protest movement fails to address the role of foreign powers
including pressures exerted by “investors”, external creditors and
international financial institutions, the objective of national
sovereignty will not be achieved. In which case, what will occur is a
narrow process of “regime replacement”, which ensures political
continuity.
the protest movement fails to address the role of foreign powers
including pressures exerted by “investors”, external creditors and
international financial institutions, the objective of national
sovereignty will not be achieved. In which case, what will occur is a
narrow process of “regime replacement”, which ensures political
continuity.
“Dictators”
are seated and unseated. When they are politically discredited and no
longer serve the interests of their US sponsors, they are replaced by a
new leader, often recruited from within the ranks of the political
opposition.
are seated and unseated. When they are politically discredited and no
longer serve the interests of their US sponsors, they are replaced by a
new leader, often recruited from within the ranks of the political
opposition.
In
Tunisia, the Obama administration has already positioned itself. It
intends to play a key role in the “democratization program” (i.e. the
holding of so-called fair elections). It also intends to use the
political crisis as a means to weaken the role of France and
consolidate its position in North Africa:
Tunisia, the Obama administration has already positioned itself. It
intends to play a key role in the “democratization program” (i.e. the
holding of so-called fair elections). It also intends to use the
political crisis as a means to weaken the role of France and
consolidate its position in North Africa:
“The United States, which was quick to size up the groundswell of protest on the streets of Tunisia, is trying to press its advantage to push for democratic reforms in the country and further afield.
The
top-ranking US envoy for the Middle East, Jeffrey Feltman, was the
first foreign official to arrive in the country after president Zine El
Abidine Ben Ali was ousted on January 14 and swiftly called for
reforms. He said on Tuesday only free and fair elections would
strengthen and give credibility to the north African state’s embattled
leadership.
top-ranking US envoy for the Middle East, Jeffrey Feltman, was the
first foreign official to arrive in the country after president Zine El
Abidine Ben Ali was ousted on January 14 and swiftly called for
reforms. He said on Tuesday only free and fair elections would
strengthen and give credibility to the north African state’s embattled
leadership.
“I
certainly expect that we’ll be using the Tunisian example” in talks
with other Arab governments, Assistant Secretary of State Feltman
added.
certainly expect that we’ll be using the Tunisian example” in talks
with other Arab governments, Assistant Secretary of State Feltman
added.
He was dispatched to the north African country to offer US help in the turbulent transition of power, and met with Tunisian ministers and civil society figures.
Feltman travels to Paris on Wednesday to discuss the crisis with French leaders, boosting the impression that the US is leading international support for a new Tunisia, to the detriment of its former colonial power, France. …
Western
nations had long supported Tunisia’s ousted leadership, seeing it as a
bulwark against Islamic militants in the north Africa region.
nations had long supported Tunisia’s ousted leadership, seeing it as a
bulwark against Islamic militants in the north Africa region.
In 2006, the then US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, speaking in Tunis, praised the country’s evolution.
US
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton nimbly stepped in with a speech in
Doha on January 13 warning Arab leaders to allow their citizens greater
freedoms or risk extremists exploiting the situation.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton nimbly stepped in with a speech in
Doha on January 13 warning Arab leaders to allow their citizens greater
freedoms or risk extremists exploiting the situation.
“There is no doubt that the United States is trying to position itself very quickly on the good side,…” ” AFP: US helping shape outcome of Tunisian uprising emphasis added
Will Washington be successful in instating a new puppet regime?
This
very much depends on the ability of the protest movement to address
the insidious role of the US in the country’s internal affairs.
very much depends on the ability of the protest movement to address
the insidious role of the US in the country’s internal affairs.
The
overriding powers of empire are not mentioned. In a bitter irony,
president Obama has expressed his support for the protest movement.
overriding powers of empire are not mentioned. In a bitter irony,
president Obama has expressed his support for the protest movement.
Many
people within the protest movement are led to believe that president
Obama is committed to democracy and human rights, and is supportive of
the opposition’s resolve to unseat a dictator, which was installed by
the US in the first place.
people within the protest movement are led to believe that president
Obama is committed to democracy and human rights, and is supportive of
the opposition’s resolve to unseat a dictator, which was installed by
the US in the first place.
Cooptation of Opposition Leaders
The
cooptation of the leaders of major opposition parties and civil
society organizations in anticipation of the collapse of an
authoritarian puppet government is part of Washington’s design, applied
in different regions of the World.
cooptation of the leaders of major opposition parties and civil
society organizations in anticipation of the collapse of an
authoritarian puppet government is part of Washington’s design, applied
in different regions of the World.
The process of cooptation is
implemented and financed by US based foundations including the
National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Freedom House (FH). Both FH
and the NED have links to the US Congress. the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), and the US business establishment. Both the NED and FH
are known to have ties to the CIA.
The NED is actively involved in Tunisia, Egypt and Algeria. Freedom House supports several civil society organizations in Egypt.
“The
NED was established by the Reagan administration after the CIA’s role
in covertly funding efforts to overthrow foreign governments was
brought to light, leading to the discrediting of the parties,
movements, journals, books, newspapers and individuals that received
CIA funding. … As a bipartisan endowment, with participation from the
two major parties, as well as the AFL-CIO and US Chamber of Commerce,
the NED took over the financing of foreign overthrow movements, but
overtly and under the rubric of “democracy promotion.” (Stephen Gowans,
January « 2011 “What’s left”
NED was established by the Reagan administration after the CIA’s role
in covertly funding efforts to overthrow foreign governments was
brought to light, leading to the discrediting of the parties,
movements, journals, books, newspapers and individuals that received
CIA funding. … As a bipartisan endowment, with participation from the
two major parties, as well as the AFL-CIO and US Chamber of Commerce,
the NED took over the financing of foreign overthrow movements, but
overtly and under the rubric of “democracy promotion.” (Stephen Gowans,
January « 2011 “What’s left”
While
the US has supported the Mubarak government for the last thirty years,
US foundations with ties to the US State department and the Pentagon
have actively supported the political opposition including the civil
society movement. According to Freedom House: “Egyptian civil society
is both vibrant and constrained. There are hundreds of non-governmental
organizations devoted to expanding civil and political rights in the
country, operating in a highly regulated environment.” (Freedom House Press Releases).
the US has supported the Mubarak government for the last thirty years,
US foundations with ties to the US State department and the Pentagon
have actively supported the political opposition including the civil
society movement. According to Freedom House: “Egyptian civil society
is both vibrant and constrained. There are hundreds of non-governmental
organizations devoted to expanding civil and political rights in the
country, operating in a highly regulated environment.” (Freedom House Press Releases).
In
a bitter irony, Washington supports the Mubarak dictatorship,
including its atrocities, while also backing and financing its
detractors, through the activities of FH, the NED, among others.
a bitter irony, Washington supports the Mubarak dictatorship,
including its atrocities, while also backing and financing its
detractors, through the activities of FH, the NED, among others.
Under
the auspices of Freedom House, Egyptian dissidents and opponents of
Hosni Mubarak were received in May 2008 by Condoleezza Rice at the
State Department and the US Congress. They also met White House
National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, who was “the principal White
House foreign policy adviser” during George W. Bush’s second term.
Freedom
House’s effort to empower a new generation of advocates has yielded
tangible results and the New Generation program in Egypt has gained
prominence both locally and internationally. Egyptian visiting
fellows from all civil society groups received [May 2008] unprecedented
attention and recognition, including meetings in Washington with US
Secretary of State, the National Security Advisor, and prominent
members of Congress. In the words of Condoleezza Rice, the fellows
represent the “hope for the future of Egypt.”
House’s effort to empower a new generation of advocates has yielded
tangible results and the New Generation program in Egypt has gained
prominence both locally and internationally. Egyptian visiting
fellows from all civil society groups received [May 2008] unprecedented
attention and recognition, including meetings in Washington with US
Secretary of State, the National Security Advisor, and prominent
members of Congress. In the words of Condoleezza Rice, the fellows
represent the “hope for the future of Egypt.”
Freedom House, http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=66&program=84 (emphasis added).
Political Double Talk: Chatting with “Dictators”, Mingling with “Dissidents”
The
Egyptian pro-democracy delegation to the State Department was
described by Condoleezza Rice as “The Hope for the Future of Egypt”.
Egyptian pro-democracy delegation to the State Department was
described by Condoleezza Rice as “The Hope for the Future of Egypt”.
In
May 2009, Hillary Clinton met a delegation of Egyptian dissidents,
several of which had met Condoleezza Rice a year earlier. These high
level meetings were held a week prior to Obama’s visit to Egypt:
May 2009, Hillary Clinton met a delegation of Egyptian dissidents,
several of which had met Condoleezza Rice a year earlier. These high
level meetings were held a week prior to Obama’s visit to Egypt:
U.S.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton praised the work of a group of
Egyptian civil society activists she met with today and said it was in
Egypt’s interest to move toward democracy and to exhibit more respect
for human rights.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton praised the work of a group of
Egyptian civil society activists she met with today and said it was in
Egypt’s interest to move toward democracy and to exhibit more respect
for human rights.
The 16 activists
met with Clinton and Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near
Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman in Washington at the end of a two-month
fellowship organized by Freedom House’s New Generation program.
met with Clinton and Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near
Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman in Washington at the end of a two-month
fellowship organized by Freedom House’s New Generation program.
The
fellows raised concern about what they perceived as the United States
government distancing itself from Egyptian civil society and called on President Obama to meet with young independent civil society activists when he visits Cairo next week. They also urged the Obama administration to continue to provide political and financial support to Egyptian civil society
and to help open the space for nongovernmental organizations which is
tightly restricted under Egypt’s longstanding emergency law.
fellows raised concern about what they perceived as the United States
government distancing itself from Egyptian civil society and called on President Obama to meet with young independent civil society activists when he visits Cairo next week. They also urged the Obama administration to continue to provide political and financial support to Egyptian civil society
and to help open the space for nongovernmental organizations which is
tightly restricted under Egypt’s longstanding emergency law.
The fellows told Clinton that momentum was already building in Egypt for increased civil and human rights and that U.S. support at this time was urgently needed.
They stressed that civil society represents a moderate and peaceful
“third way” in Egypt, an alternative to authoritarian elements in the
government and those that espouse theocratic rule. (Freedom House, May
2009)
They stressed that civil society represents a moderate and peaceful
“third way” in Egypt, an alternative to authoritarian elements in the
government and those that espouse theocratic rule. (Freedom House, May
2009)
During their fellowship, the activists spent a week in Washington receiving training in advocacy and getting an inside look at the way U.S. democracy works.
After their training, the fellows were matched with civil society
organizations throughout the country where they shared experiences with
U.S. counterparts. The activists will wrap up their program …
by visiting U.S. government officials, members of Congress, media
outlets and think tanks.” (Freedom House, May 2009, emphasis added)
After their training, the fellows were matched with civil society
organizations throughout the country where they shared experiences with
U.S. counterparts. The activists will wrap up their program …
by visiting U.S. government officials, members of Congress, media
outlets and think tanks.” (Freedom House, May 2009, emphasis added)
These
opposition civil society groups –which are currently playing an
important role in the protest movement– are supported and funded by
the US. They indelibly serve US interests.
opposition civil society groups –which are currently playing an
important role in the protest movement– are supported and funded by
the US. They indelibly serve US interests.
The invitation of
Egyptian dissidents to the State Department and the US Congress also
purports to instil a feeling of commitment and allegiance to American
democratic values. America is presented as a model of Freedom and
Justice. Obama is upheld as a “Role Model”.
`
Egyptian dissidents, Fellows of Freedom House in Washington DC (2008
)
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks with “Egyptian activists promoting freedom and
democracy”, prior to meetings at the State Department in Washington, DC, May 28, 2009.
democracy”, prior to meetings at the State Department in Washington, DC, May 28, 2009.
Compare the two pictures 2008 delegation received by Condoleezza Rice versus 2009 delegation
meeting Hillary Clinton in May 2009
Hillary Clinton and Hosni Mubarak in Sharm El Sheik, September 2010
Condoleezza Rice chats with Hosni Mubarak? ” Hope for the Future of Egypt”.
Condoleezza Rice addresses Freedom House. 4th from left
The Puppet Masters Support the Protest Movement against their own Puppets
The puppet masters support dissent against their own puppets?
Its called “political leveraging”, “manufacturing dissent”. Support
the dictator as well as the opponents of the dictator as a means of
controlling the political opposition.
These
actions on the part of Freedom House and the National Endowment for
Democracy, on behalf of the Bush and Obama administrations, ensure that
the US funded civil society opposition will not direct their energies
against the puppet masters behind the Mubarak regime, namely the US
government.
actions on the part of Freedom House and the National Endowment for
Democracy, on behalf of the Bush and Obama administrations, ensure that
the US funded civil society opposition will not direct their energies
against the puppet masters behind the Mubarak regime, namely the US
government.
These US
funded civil society organizations act as a “Trojan Horse” which
becomes embedded within the protest movement. They protect the
interests of the puppet masters. They ensure that the grassroots
protest movement will not address the broader issue of foreign
interference in the affairs of sovereign states.
funded civil society organizations act as a “Trojan Horse” which
becomes embedded within the protest movement. They protect the
interests of the puppet masters. They ensure that the grassroots
protest movement will not address the broader issue of foreign
interference in the affairs of sovereign states.
The Facebook Twitter Bloggers Supported and Financed by Washington
In
relation to the protest movement in Egypt, several civil society
groups funded by US based foundations have led the protest on Twitter
and Facebook:
relation to the protest movement in Egypt, several civil society
groups funded by US based foundations have led the protest on Twitter
and Facebook:
“Activists
from Egypt’s Kifaya (Enough) movement – a coalition of government
opponents – and the 6th of April Youth Movement organized the protests
on the Facebook and Twitter social networking websites. Western news
reports said Twitter appeared to be blocked in Egypt later Tuesday.”
(See Voice of America, ,Egypt Rocked by Deadly Anti-Government Protests
from Egypt’s Kifaya (Enough) movement – a coalition of government
opponents – and the 6th of April Youth Movement organized the protests
on the Facebook and Twitter social networking websites. Western news
reports said Twitter appeared to be blocked in Egypt later Tuesday.”
(See Voice of America, ,Egypt Rocked by Deadly Anti-Government Protests
Kifaya movement, which organized one of the first protests directed
against the Mubarak regime in late 2004, is supported by the US based International Center for Non-Violent Conflict . Kifaya is a broad-based movement which has also taken a stance on Palestine and US interventionism in the region.
In turn, Freedom House has been involved in promoting and training the Middle East North Africa Facebook and Twitter blogs:
Freedom House fellows acquired skills in civic mobilization, leadership, and strategic planning, and benefit
from networking opportunities through interaction with
Washington-based donors, international organizations and the media.
After returning to Egypt, the fellows received small grants to
implement innovative initiatives such as advocating for political
reform through Facebook and SMS messaging.
from networking opportunities through interaction with
Washington-based donors, international organizations and the media.
After returning to Egypt, the fellows received small grants to
implement innovative initiatives such as advocating for political
reform through Facebook and SMS messaging.
http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=66&program=84 (emphasis added)
From
February 27 to March 13 [2010], Freedom House hosted 11 bloggers from
the Middle East and North Africa [from different civil society
organizations] for a two-week Advanced New Media Study Tour in
Washington, D.C. The Study Tour provided the bloggers with training in
digital security, digital video making, message development and digital
mapping. While in D.C., the Fellows also participated in a Senate
briefing, and met with high-level officials at USAID, State
[Department] and Congress as well as international media including
Al-Jazeera and the Washington Post.http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=115&program=84&item=87 emphasis added
February 27 to March 13 [2010], Freedom House hosted 11 bloggers from
the Middle East and North Africa [from different civil society
organizations] for a two-week Advanced New Media Study Tour in
Washington, D.C. The Study Tour provided the bloggers with training in
digital security, digital video making, message development and digital
mapping. While in D.C., the Fellows also participated in a Senate
briefing, and met with high-level officials at USAID, State
[Department] and Congress as well as international media including
Al-Jazeera and the Washington Post.http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=115&program=84&item=87 emphasis added
One
can easily apprehend the importance attached by the US administration
to this bloggers’ “training program”, which is coupled with high level
meetings at the US Senate, the Congress, the State Department, etc.
can easily apprehend the importance attached by the US administration
to this bloggers’ “training program”, which is coupled with high level
meetings at the US Senate, the Congress, the State Department, etc.
The
role of the Facebook Twitter social media as an expression of dissent,
must be carefully evaluated in the light of the links of several
Egyptian civil society organizations to Freedom House (FH), the
National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the US State Department.
role of the Facebook Twitter social media as an expression of dissent,
must be carefully evaluated in the light of the links of several
Egyptian civil society organizations to Freedom House (FH), the
National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the US State Department.
BBC
News World (broadcast in the Middle East) quoting Egyptian internet
messages has reported that “the US has been sending money to
pro-democracy groups.” (BBC News World, January 29, 2010). According to
a report in The Daily Telegraph, quoting a secret US embassy document (Jan 29, 2011):
“The
protests in Egypt are being driven by the April 6 youth movement, a
group on Facebook that has attracted mainly young and educated members
opposed to Mr Mubarak. The group has about 70,000 members and uses social networking sites to orchestrate protests and report on their activities.
protests in Egypt are being driven by the April 6 youth movement, a
group on Facebook that has attracted mainly young and educated members
opposed to Mr Mubarak. The group has about 70,000 members and uses social networking sites to orchestrate protests and report on their activities.
The documents released by WikiLeaks reveal US Embassy officials [in Cairo] were in regular contact with the activist throughout 2008 and 2009, considering him one of their most reliable sources for information about human rights abuses.” (emphasis added)
The Muslim Brotherhood
The
Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt constitutes the largest segment of the
opposition to president Mubarak. According to reports, The Muslim
Brotherhood dominates the protest movement.
Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt constitutes the largest segment of the
opposition to president Mubarak. According to reports, The Muslim
Brotherhood dominates the protest movement.
While
there is a constitutional ban against religious political parties
Brotherhood members elected to Egypt’s parliament as “independents”
constitute the largest parliamentary block.
there is a constitutional ban against religious political parties
Brotherhood members elected to Egypt’s parliament as “independents”
constitute the largest parliamentary block.
The
Brotherhood, however, does not constitute a direct threat to
Washington’s economic and strategic interests in the region. Western
intelligence agencies have a longstanding history of collaboration with
the Brotherhood. Britain’s support of the Brotherhood instrumented
through the British Secret Service dates back to the 1940s. Starting in
the 1950s, according to former intelligence official William Baer,
“The CIA [funnelled] support to the Muslim Brotherhood because of “the
Brotherhood’s commendable capability to overthrow Nasser.”1954-1970: CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood Ally to Oppose Egyptian President Nasser, These covert links to the CIA were maintained in the post-Nasser era.
Brotherhood, however, does not constitute a direct threat to
Washington’s economic and strategic interests in the region. Western
intelligence agencies have a longstanding history of collaboration with
the Brotherhood. Britain’s support of the Brotherhood instrumented
through the British Secret Service dates back to the 1940s. Starting in
the 1950s, according to former intelligence official William Baer,
“The CIA [funnelled] support to the Muslim Brotherhood because of “the
Brotherhood’s commendable capability to overthrow Nasser.”1954-1970: CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood Ally to Oppose Egyptian President Nasser, These covert links to the CIA were maintained in the post-Nasser era.
Concluding Remarks
The removal of Hosni Mubarak has, for several years, been on the drawing board of US foreign policy.
Regime replacement serves to ensure continuity, while providing the illusion that meaningful political change has occurred.
Washington’s
agenda for Egypt has been to “hijack the protest movement” and replace
president Hosni Mubarak with a new compliant puppet head of state.
Washington’s objective is to sustain the interests of foreign powers, to
uphold the neoliberal economic agenda which has served to impoverish
the Egyptian population. From Washington’s
standpoint, regime replacement no longer requires the installation of
an authoritarian military regime as in the heyday of US imperialism, It
can be implemented by co-opting political parties, including the Left,
financing civil society groups, infiltrating the protest movement and
manipulating national elections. With reference to the protest movement in Egypt, President Obama stated in a January 28 video broadcast on Youtube: “The Government Should Not Resort to Violence”. The
more fundamental question is what is the source of that violence?
Egypt is the largest recipient of US military aid after Israel. The
Egyptian military is considered to be the power base of the Mubarak
regime:
agenda for Egypt has been to “hijack the protest movement” and replace
president Hosni Mubarak with a new compliant puppet head of state.
Washington’s objective is to sustain the interests of foreign powers, to
uphold the neoliberal economic agenda which has served to impoverish
the Egyptian population. From Washington’s
standpoint, regime replacement no longer requires the installation of
an authoritarian military regime as in the heyday of US imperialism, It
can be implemented by co-opting political parties, including the Left,
financing civil society groups, infiltrating the protest movement and
manipulating national elections. With reference to the protest movement in Egypt, President Obama stated in a January 28 video broadcast on Youtube: “The Government Should Not Resort to Violence”. The
more fundamental question is what is the source of that violence?
Egypt is the largest recipient of US military aid after Israel. The
Egyptian military is considered to be the power base of the Mubarak
regime:
“The country’s army
and police forces are geared to the teeth thanks to more than $1
billion in military aid a year from Washington. … When the US
officially describes Egypt as “an important ally” it is inadvertently
referring to Mubarak’s role as a garrison outpost for US military
operations and dirty war tactics in the Middle East and beyond. There is
clear evidence from international human rights groups that countless
“suspects” rendered by US forces in their various territories of
(criminal) operations are secretly dumped in Egypt for “deep
interrogation”. The country serves as a giant “Guantanamo” of the Middle
East, conveniently obscured from US public interest and relieved of
legal niceties over human rights.” (Finian Cunningham, Egypt: US-Backed Repression is Insight for American Public, Global Research, January 28, 2010).
America
is no “Role Model” of Democratization for the Middle East. US military
presence imposed on Egypt and the Arab World for more than 20 years,
coupled with “free market” reforms are the root cause of State violence.
America’s intent is to use the protest movement to install a new regime.
The
People’s Movement should redirect its energies: Identify the
relationship between America and “the dictator”. Unseat America’s
political puppet but do not forget to target the “real dictators”.
People’s Movement should redirect its energies: Identify the
relationship between America and “the dictator”. Unseat America’s
political puppet but do not forget to target the “real dictators”.
Shunt the process of regime change.
Dismantle the neoliberal reforms.
Close down US military bases in the Arab World.
Establish a truly sovereign government.
So you do not blame Muslim Fundamentalists for executing the former president Anwar Sadat for making peace with Israel? Somehow its Americas fault again? See history 101.Sadat was executed for making peace with Israel. Hosni came to power . Noone objected. They just want a new dictator.Its nothing to do with freedom. Just ask the woman of which you do not see on the streets.
This was posted from a good friend the UK, All I look at is there are people suffering who need help from caring souls worldwide. there is a new generation, a tribe of many colors, the rainbow warriors, and we do not discriminate race, religion, or creed. Our purpose is to band together and help all the living creatures on our mother earth.
Love and light always
XXOOO
“Acceptance of others, their looks, their behaviors, their beliefs,
bring you an inner peace and tranquility —
instead of anger and resentment”
~ Source Unknown ♥
Positive Outlooks