If It Walks Like a Duck, If It Talks Like a Duck, If It Looks Like a Duck – It Must Be a Cat or Dog
That is at least one on blogger would like for us to believe.
He constantly assures us that he is not against people, but all of the political blogs that I have seen him write since I have come to FriendBurst are blogs railing against the powerless, the poor.
Never once have I seen a blog posted by him take on the powerful, the rich.
I say, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and looks like a duck, it must be a duck.
Why is it that you don’t attack him on his own blog? Why do you feel the need to make your own blog to attack someone you don’t agree with? There’s really no need…what ever you feel like saying about his blog, you can say it on his blog….I do…
How old are you?
Lost me on this one mate.
Sometimes you simply cannot have a reasonable conversation. At least two people must be capable and agree to do so before this can happen.
I’m trying to understand how you saw his blog as being AGAINST the powerless and poor. It was more out of CONCERN for their situation,but against the means by which they are KEPT that way (which is,as consequence,taking on the powerful). Do you not agree that the poor should be given means of lifting themselves out of their situation rather than merely sustained at that level?
Archived image unavailable
John…you really should talk to Vic about his blog…even if it’s in private, he’s reasonable…
Have a good night…:)
I Was going to say something here.
But, NAh! Never mind…
“oooh yeah.
“Something”
-There, I said it.. 😆
I think I know who you’re talking about… He IS harsh on those who fraud the system, but, I really don’t think he means malice toward those who really need the social services… Conservatives generally don’t go against the rich & powerful because they’re seen as the job providers, generally, even though there’s much corruption on that end, probably more than with poor people with social programs…
That’s why I say that corporate welfare should not exist unless they’re doing a benefit to the people such as hiring more people, or offering full time w/ benefits, etc… You can’t HOPE they’ll create jobs by offering a steak to these companies. You have to tell them to hire the people first, THEN they get a steak. In the mean time, they want to feed poor people carrots, and if you hate carrots, they give you the finger…
Ok, now about this blog.
I FINALLY agreed 100% with Vic on THIS new blog he made (today).
All he was saying is that the Govt actually provides more in welfare for the single mom of 3 than she could make actually working and thereby trapping her into a welfare state.
Common sense proves that its what a mom would do to give her children support (take the side with the most amount of money).
I have seen him attack Washingtons rich bureaucrats and just RECENTLY and those who are rich that seek to keep a big divide in party lines.
Sure he might not make the rich his MAIN “topic”, but he HAS attacked the rich on some occasions.
As a person who DETESTS the greedy rich, I would NOT be defending him if he didnt deserve any defending.
Yea, I LIKE Robin Hood!!! hehehe
And I think he should rob those who are rich to give to the poor so they can buy cigarettes and cable internet connections…and maybe some beers too!!! 😆
I see your point John. Left a heart.
I had to laugh out loud at the suggestion that you take this up with Vic himself. Also, whoever said that he could post about anything he wanted, but yet I guess that isn’t afforded to you too.
I agree that I never see him rail against the corporations either. But then again he is like most Conservatives that are for big Corporations that eat the average man on a daily basis. He seems to have a huge hard-on for poor people on welfare. It really makes you wonder why he talks about it so much. It would have been interesting if he would have posted all the measures to help lift people out of poverty that the Republicans have either defunded or cut back dramatically or wiped out all together. But that would have made his side look bad, wouldn’t have it?!!