Planned Parenthood Abortion Business Makes $1 Billion Income for First Time
FIRST AND FOREMOST, THE MAJORITY OF WOMEN DON’T USE PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOR LIFE SAVING HEALTH CARE!
WOMEN WHO LIVE IN POVERTY HAVE MEDICADE FOR ALL THEIR POTENTIAL HEALTH CONCERNS!
HELLO, OBAMACARE IS HERE, LOL!
NOW TELL ME AGAIN LIBERALS HOW DEFUNDING THE BILLION DOLLAR ABORTION CORPORATION, PLANNED PARENTHOOD WILL PUT WOMEN HEALTH IN DANGER? LOL, LOL, LOL!
A new annual report from Planned Parenthood shows the nation’s largest abortion business has made over $1 billion in income for the first time in its history. The non-profit pro-abortion group shows the historical gain in its new annual report covering 2006-2007.
While Planned Parenthood made $972 milion in its 2005-2006 annual report, last fiscal year it brought in $1.017 billion.
On its web site posting of the annual document, Planned Parenthood says it “highlights our advancements in providing and protecting trusted health care services and medically accurate sexuality education.”
Instead, the report finds Planned Parenthood doing more abortions than ever before.
The report shows an increase in the number of provided abortions from 264,943 in 2005 to 289,650 in 2006.
Planned Parenthood reveals it has doubled “excess of revenue over expenses” funds from $55.7 million in 2005 to $112 million in 2006.
CAN YOU SAY BABY KILLING BLOOD MONEY, LIBERALS?
http://www.lifenews.com/2008/03/28/nat-3822/
The revelations from the annual report upset Tony Perkins, the head of the Family Research Council.
“A majority of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortion — however, still Planned Parenthood receives more than $300 million in taxpayer funding each year for ‘family planning’ projects that help bolster their abortion trade,” he told LifeNews.com.
He said Planned Parenthood was not a “wise investment” of public money because of its history.
“Would you invest in a company whose affiliates are complicit in sexual crimes against children?” he asked, pointing to numerous instances of its centers doing abortions on victims of statutory rape and sexual abuse.
AND THE MARGARET SANGER LOVERS SAY, YES WE CAN!!! 😈
Abortion Backers Not Interested in Health, Safety of Women
by Ciara Matthews | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 7/21/11 4:54 PM
Time and again, the pro-abortion movement engages in a collective attack on state legislators when new laws and regulations on abortions are passed around the country. Abortion proponents just can’t seem to wrap their heads around the idea that Americans’ views on the issue of life are trending in our favor.
The most recent “I can’t believe this!” moment occurred not long after the passage of new clinic regulations in Kansas. First, some background:
In 2010, an abortion doctor in Pennsylvania was found to have killed at least one patient, spread venereal diseases to countless others, preformed illegal late-term abortions, kept aborted baby parts in the same refrigerator where employees stored their lunches, and used infanticide as a measure for terminating pregnancies when he couldn’t do so otherwise. He went 17 years unchecked by the state’s health department because then-governor Tom Ridge felt the yearly health inspections of abortion clinics put up “a barrier to women.”
However, the debate continues not only because Planned Parenthood — an organization that claims to be looking out for the rights of women — is fighting back against the health regulations designed to keep women safe, but also because liberal, pro-abortion commentators are losing their marbles over the idea that certain requirements should be met in order for a health care provider to perform an abortion.
Now, this naturally raises a question: What exactly are these regulations that seem to have the Left in such a tizzy? The examples that the pro-abortion community cites most often are the new measures requiring a fully stocked janitor closet, operating rooms large enough for a gurney to fit inside, certain drugs and medical equipment — like blood pressure cuffs — to be readily available, and recovery rooms to be a certain temperature.
My word! Those anti-choice extremists! (Insert sarcastic cough here)
Addressing the concerns about operating-room size and the mandate to have certain medication and equipment on hand would be even more pointless than the points themselves. They are not only self-explanatory but entirely reasonable. But, for the sake of not dismissing them outright, here are a few points the pro-abortion crowd either forgot to mention about the new regulations or decided weren’t worth the six-second Google search:
1. A good portion of the new Kansas requirements come from suggestions made by the National Federation of Abortion. That’s right: The organization responsible for providing “quality training and services to abortion providers” has its own set of guidelines it says clinics should follow. The Kansas Legislature relied upon these guidelines as a model for its new legislation.
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/07/21/abortion-backers-not-interested-in-health-safety-of-women/
I had hoped that when Indiana defunded Planned Paremthood at the state level, other states would capitulate enough to build a national consensus that as long as Planned Parenthood included funding and referral of and to abortion providers, taxpayer money would not be subsidizing this obviously profitable business.
Make no mistake—i think that Planned Parenthood does fund and council worthy causes like impoverished womens’ annual cancer screenings, abstinence, birth control (pharma and methodology) and so on. Cervical and breast cancer in women are still killing our mothers, grandmothers, sisters and daughters and I am glad that Planned Parenthood is their to help these women that cannot afford health insurance.
Having said that—I believe that unless and until Planned Parenthood completely severs it’s funding of the ghoulish practice of enabling the murders of unborn human beings—no taxpayer funding from any level of government should be alive.
Proponents of Planned Parenthood would tell you that Planned Parenthood cannot use taxpayer funding for abortions by law, so the problem has been solved. I would argue that since only one third of Planned Parenthood funding is from taxpayer sources, and, multi-souce funding is by it’s very nature of co-mingling of funds—fungible (mutually substitutable)— there is this effect of “freeing up” of other non-taxpayer funds for the abortion providers—which is the same thing as using taxpayer funds to murder innocent unborn human beings…
Good blog as always, James. Keep up the good fight! :love: 😉
Well…when I realized a baby has a heartbeat at 18 days…it made me think. Guess I’ll go along with the day after pill…or an abortion anytime in the first 17 days after conception. After that..it’s MURDER! Am I getting closer Jedi?