{"id":13341,"date":"2011-01-29T19:06:13","date_gmt":"2011-01-30T00:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/13341\/sea-shepherds-antarctic-campaign\/"},"modified":"2011-01-29T19:06:13","modified_gmt":"2011-01-30T00:06:13","slug":"sea-shepherds-antarctic-campaign","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/13341\/sea-shepherds-antarctic-campaign\/","title":{"rendered":"Will this be Sea Shepherd\u2019s last Antarctic Campaign?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b><br \/><a>Animal Rights<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2>Will this be Sea Shepherd\u2019s last Antarctic Campaign?<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h4>Commentary by Captain Paul Watson<\/h4>\n<p>Friday, January 28, 2011<\/p>\n<p>Will this be Sea Shepherd Conservation Society\u2019s last Antarctic  campaign? I sincerely hope so, and the outlook is promising that the  whale wars in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary may be coming to an  end. The writing is on the wall for the Japanese whalers.<\/p>\n<p>This is the weakest the Japanese whaling fleet has ever been, with just a factory ship and three harpoon vessels. The <em>Shonan Maru No. 2<\/em> security ship is no longer with the whaling fleet, and the spotter vessels are no longer part of the poaching operation either.<\/p>\n<p>But, this is the strongest the Sea Shepherd fleet has ever been. We  have three vessels, a new longer-range helicopter, new equipment, and  three incredibly dedicated volunteer crews.<\/p>\n<p>We have not heard anything from Glen Inwood, or Ginza Glen, as we  like to call him, the New Zealand mouthpiece for the whalers. He is  strangely silent this season, and perhaps his public relations contract  with the whalers has not been renewed.<\/p>\n<p>The Japanese economy is in trouble. The value of the Japanese yen has  been falling recently, and the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR) has  become an economic liability for the Japanese government, in addition  to being a constant irritation for the Japanese Foreign Ministry. The  whaling industry has also been scandalized by charges of bribery,  embezzlement, and corruption.<\/p>\n<p>Every year Japan is humiliated at the International Whaling  Commission, and now Australia wants to haul Japan before the  International Court in The Hague to challenge their activities in the  Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.<\/p>\n<p>On January 20, 2011, Kyodo Senpaku, the Japan Whaling Association,  and the Institute of Cetacean Research held a media conference.<\/p>\n<p>Kazuo Murayama, the CEO of Kyodo Senpaku and the head of the Japan  Whaling Association reported \u201cannual sales (whale meat) have decreased  30% during the first half of 2010.\u201d \u00a0In response he announced that JWA\u2019s  activities may be decreased as a result. The Institute of Cetacean  Research announced that it has reduced the number of its executive  directors to one. Yoshihiro Fujise, the remaining Executive Director  stated that the \u201cfinancial model of covering the research costs by  selling whale meat as a \u2018byproduct\u2019 of the research no longer worked.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Publications like <em>New Scientist<\/em> and marine biologists from  around the world have condemned the so-called scientific justification  of the whaling operations. The hysterical rantings of the ICR on  Facebook, their website, and in media releases has become focused on  condemnation of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. What they call  piracy, eco-terrorism, and militant extremism is simply what we call  conservative anti-poaching operations. Sea Shepherd is simply defending  the integrity of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.<\/p>\n<p>Critics of Sea Shepherd have said the only reason that Japan  continues to kill whales is because of Sea Shepherd, and that the  Japanese have too much pride to back down from opposition from a  non-governmental organization. Statements from the Japanese Fisheries  Agency and the ICR seem to suggest that this has now become a matter of  saving face. There now seems to be an obsession with destroying Sea  Shepherd with the Japanese Foreign Ministry increasing pressure on the  Netherlands, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand to neutralize  Sea Shepherd.<\/p>\n<p>Some anti-whaling critics have suggested that Sea Shepherd back off  from opposing the Japanese whalers to allow them to exit with grace. I  disagree. The Japanese whaling fleet is where it is now because of Sea  Shepherd. We have taken their profits away, and increased their  operating costs for six straight years. They are now in debt so badly  that the subsidy loans from the Japanese government will only continue  to increase. We cannot back off and allow them to make any profit that  may be applied to the repayment of these loans.<\/p>\n<p>Our objective is not to win the hearts and minds of the Japanese  public. Winning the hearts and minds of the majority of Canadians did  not influence the policies of the Canadian government, whose reaction to  more and more Canadians opposing the seal slaughter was to become more  entrenched in their defense of the killing of seals. The seal hunt is  also an industry that survives because of corporate welfare from the  Canadian federal government.<\/p>\n<p>In a true free market system, both the Japanese whale hunt and the  Canadian seal hunt would have expired by going bankrupt. Now both  enterprises continue to survive because of this new invention called  corporate communism. However in both cases, and despite government  handouts, both whaling and sealing continue to decline, as there is no  hope of realizing any so-called profit in the foreseeable future. In  effect, both are dead industries surviving by the grace of politicians  and bureaucrats. Public opinion has little impact on these decisions. In  fact with Japan, it can be argued that outside public opinion or  gaiatsu as it is known in Japan, carries more weight than domestic  pressure.<\/p>\n<p>The Japanese media tends to be nationalistic and pro-government. For a  long time, the average Japanese citizen was completely unaware of the  whaling operations in the Southern Ocean. It was the drama of the  confrontations with Sea Shepherd that made the Japanese public aware.<\/p>\n<p>Sea Shepherd\u2019s objective has long been to sink the Japanese whaling  fleet economically \u2013 to bankrupt them, and it is a strategy that appears  to be working.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the propaganda from Japan, Sea Shepherd is not doing anything  illegal. None of our ships have been charged or detained, we have not  been reprimanded, and we have not been charged with a crime, not even by  Japan. Sea Shepherd ships have access to Australian and New Zealand  ports, Japanese whaling ships do not. The Japanese whalers are also  officially in contempt of an Australian Federal Court order prohibiting  the killing of whales in Australian territorial waters.<\/p>\n<p>In 2010, Pete Bethune was charged as an individual when he boarded the <em>Shonan Maru<\/em> <em>No. 2<\/em> because he became subject to Japanese law once onboard a Japanese ship.  The decision to board the whaling fleet security vessel that had sunk  his vessel the <em>Ady Gil,<\/em> was made by Bethune. Sea Shepherd  supported his decision, and paid for his defense in Japan. However,  nothing that Sea Shepherd ships have done has been illegal or even a  breach of maritime regulations.<\/p>\n<p>Not once has a Sea Shepherd ship rammed a Japanese whaler in the  Southern Ocean, on the contrary, it was the Japanese harpoon vessels  that initiated the collisions in every case. In past years, they did the  same with Greenpeace ships and back then, they also accused Greenpeace  of initiating the collisions. Since Greenpeace has a clear policy of not  ramming ships, the Japanese accusations lost credibility when they made  the same accusations against Sea Shepherd. Sea Shepherd is not against  ramming the vessels operated by poachers. We have done so in the past,  however in the case of the defense of the Southern Ocean Whale  Sanctuary, our policy is to intercept, harass and block, and not to ram  the whaling vessels.<\/p>\n<p>It is a strategy that is working and every year we cut the kill  quotas more than the year before as our resources become stronger. This  year we have completely removed two of three harpoon vessels for the  entire first month of whaling operations, and we have kept the remaining  harpoon vessel and the <em>Nisshin Maru<\/em> factory ship on the run for 80 percent of the time, allowing them for little time to stop and kill whales.<\/p>\n<p>We are confident that the kill numbers this year will be well below  last year\u2019s figures, when we were able to prevent the killing of more  whales than they actually were able to kill. In other words, it is about  the body count. Our objective is to keep the body count as low as  possible and the whalers have an objective of killing 935 Minke whales,  50 humpbacks, and 50 fin whales for a total of 1035 whales. Last year  they killed 507 whales, and we saved 528 whales.<\/p>\n<p>There was no argument about last year\u2019s success. The whalers  themselves credited us with this by whining about the economic damage we  did to their so-called research industry.<\/p>\n<p>And now, we are coming down to the wire. Demand for whale meat in  Japan is down. There is a surplus of whale meat being kept frozen at  great expense in warehouses in Japan. The value of the yen is falling.  New International Maritime Organization (IMO) rules, which will prohibit  the use of heavy oil fuels in Antarctica after August 2011, will make  the <em>Nisshin Maru\u2019s<\/em> machinery operations illegal. Japan needs a  replacement factory ship, but has not even begun to build one. Australia  is taking Japan to the International Court in The Hague. International  public protests against Japanese whaling and dolphin killing are  increasing. Allegations of bribery and corruption within the whaling  industry and the Japanese government, are surfacing more and more.<\/p>\n<p>Thus there is a very real possibility that Japan may not send a  whaling fleet to the Southern Ocean at the end of this year, and if they  do, we will be prepared to oppose them once again. But we would rather  not. We would rather that the whales of the Southern Ocean Whale  Sanctuary be left in peace. We have spent seven seasons intervening  against these whale poachers. Each season gives us more support than the  year before, and each season increases our resources, strengthens our  supply lines, and increases our effectiveness.<\/p>\n<p>We must be prepared to return again in December 2011, and we must be  prepared to come back even stronger. To be 100 percent effective, we  could use a third large ship, or another ship with the speed to exceed  that of the harpoon vessels. The <em>Gojira<\/em> is an excellent scout  ship but we need a little more muscle. With one ship to keep each of the  harpoon vessels occupied, we could be more effective. If the Japanese  whalers return with four ships, Sea Shepherd should return with four  ships as well.<\/p>\n<p>And if they don\u2019t return, we will be in a position to move our  operations to the North Atlantic to once again challenge the outlaw  whalers of Norway, Iceland, and the Danish Faroe Islands.<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"6\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"middle\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.seashepherd.org\/no-compromise\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.seashepherd.org\/images\/stories\/no-compromise\/logo-no-compromise-90-tall.png\" alt=\"Operation No Compromise\" width=\"65\" height=\"90\" \/><\/a><\/td>\n<td align=\"center\" valign=\"middle\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.seashepherd.org\/no-compromise\/\"><strong>Operation<br \/>\nNo Compromise<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Animal Rights Will this be Sea Shepherd\u2019s last Antarctic Campaign? Commentary by Captain Paul Watson Friday, January 28, 2011 Will this be Sea Shepherd Conservation Society\u2019s last Antarctic campaign? I sincerely hope so, and the outlook is promising that the whale wars in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary may be coming to an end. The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-other"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13341\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}