{"id":85847,"date":"2012-04-05T01:19:47","date_gmt":"2012-04-05T05:19:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/85847\/national-child-abuse-prevention-month-april-2012-vs-statute-limitations\/"},"modified":"2012-04-05T01:19:47","modified_gmt":"2012-04-05T05:19:47","slug":"national-child-abuse-prevention-month-april-2012-vs-statute-limitations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/85847\/national-child-abuse-prevention-month-april-2012-vs-statute-limitations\/","title":{"rendered":"National Child Abuse Prevention Month (April 2012) VS. THE Statute of Limitations for Crimes against Children"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>National Child Abuse Prevention Month (April 2012)<\/p>\n<p>04\/2012<\/p>\n<p>April was first declared Child Abuse Prevention Month by presidential proclamation in 1983. Since then, April has been a time<\/p>\n<p>to acknowledge the importance of families and communities working together to prevent child abuse.\u00a0 In Child Maltreatment<\/p>\n<p>2010 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children &amp; Families, Administration on Children, Youth<\/p>\n<p>and Families, Children&#8217;s Bureau) it was reported that in FFY 2010 in the fifty states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto<\/p>\n<p>Rico, an estimated 695,000 children were victims of child abuse; and 1,560 children died as a result of abuse or neglect. The<\/p>\n<p>majority of child abuse cases stemmed from situations and conditions that can be preventable when community programs and<\/p>\n<p>systems are engaged and supportive. A community that cares about early childhood development, parental support, and maternal<\/p>\n<p>mental health, for instance, is more likely to foster nurturing families and healthy children.<\/p>\n<p>A body of research has identified factors known to prevent and reduce child abuse and neglect. These factors\u2014including<\/p>\n<p>parental resilience, nurturing and attachment, social connections, knowledge about parenting and child development, and<\/p>\n<p>concrete supports for parents\u2014are outlined in Strengthening Families and Communities: 2011 Resource Guide, also developed by<\/p>\n<p>the Children&#8217;s Bureau.<\/p>\n<p>In recognition of the collaborations needed to help prevent child abuse and neglect, the NCTSN has compiled a list of<\/p>\n<p>resources for advocates and policy makers, children and adolescents, educators, families and communities, and mental health<\/p>\n<p>and child welfare professionals.<\/p>\n<p>Source of above information is below.<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.nctsnet.org\/resources\/public-awareness\/national-child-abuse-prevention-month<\/p>\n<p>Rape::POPE: Statutes of Limitations? NO WAY! Pedophile Priests must Pay!!<br \/>\nBy Karen Gallo Dunn<\/p>\n<p>Time canNOT erase the Crime of Pedophile Priestly Pigs! Perhaps if the Pedophile Priest was punished properly and exposed,<\/p>\n<p>the victim&#8217;s healing process could be expedited.<\/p>\n<p>Statute of Limitations Absurd! Time canNOT erase the CRIME!!!!!!!!! Papal apologies, comforting words for those who have<\/p>\n<p>suffered abuse, molestation, rape, and torment IS Front Page news? What about the ongoing psychological, physiological<\/p>\n<p>damage, alcoholism, drug abuse, mental incapacitation, etc., that some of the abused children confronted and continue to<\/p>\n<p>confront as an adult on a daily basis? All past abuse had to be squelched and hidden &#8212; buried deep down inside until it<\/p>\n<p>begins to eat them alive? Statute of Limitation does not ELIMINATE the dirty deeds against minors, children, teens, altar<\/p>\n<p>boys, etc., enacted by the Priests, Bishops, Cardinals, et al. Statue of Limitations be gone! Rev. pervert Paul Shanley has<\/p>\n<p>been abusing children since 1967. Why in this world would his abuse and molestation be tolerated and ignored because the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;statute of limitations&#8221; has run out? He is NOW a lawfully protected priestly pig &#8212; &#8220;got away with it&#8221; rapist? Time does NOT<\/p>\n<p>eliminate the CRIME nor the long term pain and anguish of the abused. Immediate action is required to protect our innocent<\/p>\n<p>children. Who cares WHEN this tragedy occurred? Who cares HOW LONG AGO it happened? The FACT that rape, molestation, child<\/p>\n<p>abuse happened &#8212; IS what matters. Scars do NOT turn to dust. Residual harm continues and grows with time &#8212; it does not<\/p>\n<p>automatically disappear because time ran out to accuse and punish the perpetrator. Some victims NEVER recover. Is the Pope,<\/p>\n<p>Bishops and Cardinals stalling purposefully to eliminate justice? Do they set their Catholic Clocks and Watches on &#8220;Statute<\/p>\n<p>of Limitation Time?&#8221; NOW, they admit they knew about these filthy pedophiles for years and there are records on their sexual<\/p>\n<p>abuse activities. TRANSFER the guilty pedophile to another parish was the answer to solve criminal compliants from parents.<\/p>\n<p>On a daily basis, exposure of yet another perpetrating priest surfaces &#8212; WHY are we allowing them to get away with raping<\/p>\n<p>our innocent babies? We know who they are. Now take action: arrest, imprison, punish these molesters NOW. It is well known<\/p>\n<p>how Cardinal Law transferred these abusers to different locations providing priests with a fresh group of innocent children<\/p>\n<p>to rape, molest and continue their secret priestly sacraments of a pedophiliac. How dare the United States Law Enforcement<\/p>\n<p>protect these scoundrels? Does anyone care about the abused Children? Does anyone believe the abused Children. How many<\/p>\n<p>mothers out there sent their children to psychiatrists because they told the truth about a priest who was supposed to be<\/p>\n<p>above the law and holy? How many mothers ignored the reality of abuse and allowed others to be abused because they ignored<\/p>\n<p>their children&#8217;s truth? Admit it Mom &#8212; tell the truth &#8212; you knew about this abuse and covered it up &#8212; believing a man of<\/p>\n<p>the cloth &#8212; an ordained priest would never do such an atrocity or commit such a crime instead of believing an innocent child<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; your own flesh and blood????? This issue canNOT be buried any longer. The guilty must be punished and NOW is the time.<\/p>\n<p>There are NO excuses, reasons, forgiveness for these child molesters. Defrock the rapists now. Excommunicate the<\/p>\n<p>perpetrators. There should be NO exceptions, NO special treatment, NO red tape. Arrest, prosecute and punish those accused.<\/p>\n<p>Include all bishops and cardinals who knowingly provided the pedophile priests new playgrounds to continue their sick acts of<\/p>\n<p>child molestation. They are as guilty as sin because they did it intentionally with knowledge and full awareness that a<\/p>\n<p>Rapist is sick. A rapist disguised as a Priest is the worst using God as the reason to trick a child into rape, molestation<\/p>\n<p>and dirty acts. Do not forget Fr. ENEMA Scheufele, &#8220;The ENEMA&#8221; giving priest &#8212; the sacrament of &#8220;Altar Boy Enemas.&#8221; Forgive?<\/p>\n<p>Forget? Too Late to punish this pervert? These priests continue to rape our children for years and we ignore this action?<\/p>\n<p>What if these priests were clowns, ghetto dwellers, people of poverty, insane rapists? There is absolutely no difference. A<\/p>\n<p>man is a man and pig is a pig and rapist is a rapist and absolutely NO special treatment based on his costume, garb, collar,<\/p>\n<p>rosary beads, vows, etc., should be granted. Statute of Limitations be damned!! Get a grip America &#8211; Take action now. How can<\/p>\n<p>anyone justify Priestly Encounters of cruelty, sexual abuse and mind twisting sacrilegious acts? What attorney could possibly<\/p>\n<p>represent a child molester? Molesters prey upon the innocence of children &#8212; remember! &#8212; that child could be your baby,<\/p>\n<p>daughter, niece, granddaughter, son, grandson, nephew &#8212; your own flesh and blood and a dirty priest in the name of GOD takes<\/p>\n<p>advantage and molests and scrambles the child&#8217;s mind and psyche for life. NO defense acceptable! How many times is irrelevant<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; one rape is too much. One fondling is too much. Statute of Limitations be gone. This form of protection is ridiculous.<\/p>\n<p>Especially with the facts that the hierarchy is literally and specifically protecting these perpetrators. Bishops, Cardinals<\/p>\n<p>and the Pope are guilty as sin allowing this to continue and shuffling the dirty pitiful child-molesting priests to other<\/p>\n<p>parishes to allow them to continue their rape and abuse on innocent and unknowing parishioners and their children. STOP this<\/p>\n<p>NOW. Eliminate the &#8220;Statute of Limitations&#8221; when it allows child molesters a license to get away with ruining the lives of<\/p>\n<p>innocent Catholic angels and the statute of limitations is their shield of protection. Is the Pope for REAL?\u00a0 ZERO TOLERANCE<\/p>\n<p>IS THE ONLY ANSWER!!!!<\/p>\n<p>Source of Karen Gallo Dunn article below.<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.authorsden.com\/categories\/article_top.asp?catid=55&#038;id=5870<\/p>\n<p>March 23, 2012<br \/>\nMarci A. Hamilton<br \/>\nAn Historic Turning Point for Reforming Statutes of Limitations for Child Sex Abuse: News From Massachusetts, and More<\/p>\n<p>Legions of victims of child sex abuse will tell you that when they were finally ready to talk to a prosecutor or a lawyer,<\/p>\n<p>the criminal and\/or civil statutes of limitations (SOLs) had already expired.\u00a0 Across the United States, one victim after<\/p>\n<p>another has been surprised by these cruel and arbitrary legal deadlines.<\/p>\n<p>For decades, states have been adjusting their child sex abuse SOLs in response to fresh stories of horror.\u00a0 At one time,<\/p>\n<p>states measured the SOL from the date of the abuse, giving victims only a few years in which to sue.\u00a0 Then, they set age 18<\/p>\n<p>as the moment when the clock started ticking.\u00a0 Now, we have a true 50-state experiment, with a wide variety of approaches<\/p>\n<p>among the states.<\/p>\n<p>There is one common theme, however:\u00a0 States are constantly working to extend their child sex abuse SOLs, because there is<\/p>\n<p>always a new victim with a compelling story that shows lawmakers the folly of having any SOL at all for the heinous crime of<\/p>\n<p>child sex abuse.<\/p>\n<p>The Situation in Massachusetts Regarding Child Sex Abuse Statutes of Limitations<\/p>\n<p>That was precisely what was happening in Massachusetts when in 1996, the legislature extended the criminal SOL for child sex<\/p>\n<p>abuse to the date that marks 15 years after the victim turns 16.\u00a0 But that SOL still shut down justice for too many victims,<\/p>\n<p>and so there was another extension, in 2006.\u00a0 That year, the Massachusetts Legislature voted to extend the criminal SOL to 27<\/p>\n<p>years after a victim turns 16.<\/p>\n<p>That extension, however, still cut out victims like Rosanne Sliney, whose uncle abused her beginning when she was five, and<\/p>\n<p>ending when she was 14.\u00a0 Another survivor, Kathy Picard, who came forward at age 32, also remains shut out by the SOLs\u2014just<\/p>\n<p>missing each SOL extension, by just one year each time.\u00a0 Like the vast majority of child abuse survivors, Sliney and Picard<\/p>\n<p>needed decades before they could come forward to talk about their abuse, and thus, they missed the state\u2019s arbitrary limits.<\/p>\n<p>Picard, along with other child sex abuse victims, is now campaigning hard to persuade Massachusetts legislators to eliminate<\/p>\n<p>the SOLs for child sex abuse altogether.\u00a0 Right now, Massachusetts\u2019s civil statute of limitations is only 3 years from either<\/p>\n<p>the victim\u2019s 18th birthday, or the discovery of the abuse.<\/p>\n<p>Massachusetts now has a bill pending that would eliminate the criminal and civil SOLs for child sex abuse, as well as beef up<\/p>\n<p>the penalties for the failure to report such abuse, and set new requirements for the training of mandated reporters.\u00a0 That<\/p>\n<p>bill, H 469, also called \u201cThe Protection from Sexual Predators Act of 2011,\u201d would, if enacted, help hundreds of victims in<\/p>\n<p>Massachusetts and, at the same time, identify for parents the hidden predators in their midst.\u00a0 It would also make<\/p>\n<p>Massachusetts the most recent state, after Delaware to pass groundbreaking legislation that includes elimination of both<\/p>\n<p>civil and criminal SOLs for all claims into the future.<\/p>\n<p>In an Increasing Number of States, the Tide Is Turning in Favor of Legislation to Abolish Child Sex Abuse Statutes of<\/p>\n<p>Limitations Entirely\u2014but the Catholic Bishops Are Fighting the New Laws<\/p>\n<p>Massachusetts would still have Sliney and Picard on the sidelines unless it adds a window, which would permit, for a limited<\/p>\n<p>number of years, those victims whose civil claims have expired a chance go to court.\u00a0 Similar statute-of-limitations window<\/p>\n<p>legislation was passed in Minnesota, California, Delaware, and Guam, and is now pending in New York, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin,<\/p>\n<p>and Hawaii.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the tide is turning in favor of such legislation.\u00a0 The Catholic Bishops have made the defeat of child sex abuse SOL<\/p>\n<p>reform a top priority in every state where it has been introduced, and particularly the window.\u00a0 While they have occasionally<\/p>\n<p>been able to recruit allies\u2014such as, for example, Agudath Israel in New York\u2014the bishops are still the ones who have taken<\/p>\n<p>the lead on fighting against child sex abuse victims, including incest survivors (such as Kathy Picard and Rosanne Sliney),<\/p>\n<p>who make up the majority of survivors.<\/p>\n<p>The Catholic Bishops have trotted out the same bag of arguments in each state.\u00a0 First, they say it isn\u2019t \u201cfair\u201d to let them<\/p>\n<p>be sued when \u201cmemories fade and witnesses die.\u201d\u00a0 Their narcissistic insistence that state legislators must put \u201cfairness\u201d to<\/p>\n<p>them ahead of justice for the victims speaks for itself.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, that position is primarily intended to deflect legislators from focusing on two key facts: (1) eliminating the SOL<\/p>\n<p>does not change the burdens of proof, which rest first on the victim; if the victim doesn\u2019t have enough evidence to support<\/p>\n<p>the claim, no defense need be raised; and (2) the primary source of information on the abuse of children in organizations is<\/p>\n<p>typically material that is in the organization\u2019s own files, and this is particularly true for dioceses.\u00a0 Thus, the Bishops\u2019<\/p>\n<p>objection, despite its undoubted surface appeal, has no actual content.<\/p>\n<p>The Bishops\u2019 Claim That Churches Will Face \u201cBankruptcy\u201d Is Spurious<\/p>\n<p>Second, the Bishops always say that they will be \u201cbankrupted\u201d by such cases.\u00a0 If they mean that they will file voluntary<\/p>\n<p>bankruptcy in order to reduce the payouts to victims and to flush out all victims so that they can avoid further claims in<\/p>\n<p>the future, then they are right.\u00a0 But that would be their own choice, not a result of indigency.<\/p>\n<p>If the Bishops mean that they will not have enough resources to pay the claims, they are misleading the public and their own<\/p>\n<p>believers.\u00a0 The damages payments by the dioceses to victims so far have been paid by insurance (yes, they have insurance<\/p>\n<p>coverage for cases in which they have negligently supervised their employees who abuse children), and by the sale of property<\/p>\n<p>that is not devoted to religious use, such as office or apartment buildings, hotels, or empty lots.\u00a0 The largest payout in<\/p>\n<p>American history came from the Los Angeles Archdiocese, which had built an extravagant cathedral at a cost of over $189<\/p>\n<p>million just five years before. Thus, this argument, too, is a big fat red herring.<\/p>\n<p>It is a simple fact that the Bishops, regardless of what they say in public about \u201cfairness\u201d and money, just don\u2019t want the<\/p>\n<p>full truth to emerge into the sunshine.\u00a0 There are likely hundreds of unnamed priests who abused children in the New York<\/p>\n<p>Archdiocese alone.\u00a0 The hundreds of thousands\u2014indeed, likely millions\u2014of parishioners\u2019 donation dollars that have been spent<\/p>\n<p>on lobbying against the New York SOL window and modest extensions is, in all likelihood, motivated most by the Bishops\u2019<\/p>\n<p>consuming and poisonous fear of the truth.<\/p>\n<p>The Bishops have not turned the corner on the sexual abuse by their clergy\u2014far from it\u2014and they never will do so, unless they<\/p>\n<p>release the full truth of these matters, which is currently buried in their files.\u00a0 In fact, they cannot avoid the inevitable<\/p>\n<p>release of the information at issue, because the truth is also carved into the hearts, souls, and memories of their victims,<\/p>\n<p>whose voices are rising.<\/p>\n<p>Massachusetts May Be the Setting for a Key Child Sex Abuse SOL Turning Point<\/p>\n<p>The turning point appears to have come in Massachusetts, where Rep. Eugene O\u2019Flaherty did all he could to keep the SOL reform<\/p>\n<p>bill from making it out of his House Judiciary Committee.\u00a0 Yet, after he was attacked for choosing the pedophile\u2019s side<\/p>\n<p>against the safety of children, he not only backed off his original position, but resigned as Chair of the Judiciary<\/p>\n<p>Committee.\u00a0 The bill is actually going to the House floor.\u00a0 At last, a legislator so felt the heat of the victims\u2019 pent-up<\/p>\n<p>agony that he chose to cut and run.<\/p>\n<p>There are other legislators just like O\u2019Flaherty, in New York and Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, who are still carrying the<\/p>\n<p>standard for the bishops against the victims.\u00a0 But they too will have to move aside\u2014or else embrace their role as protectors<\/p>\n<p>of the pedophiles.\u00a0 The incest victims, our most silent of survivors till now, are joining their voices to those of the<\/p>\n<p>organizational victims.\u00a0 They all deserve their day in court.<\/p>\n<p>Source of article by Marci A. Hamilton is below.<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/verdict.justia.com\/2012\/03\/23\/an-historic-turning-point-for-reforming-statutes-of-limitations-for-child-sex-abuse<\/p>\n<p>Marci A. HamiltonMarci Hamilton, a Justia columnist, is the Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School<\/p>\n<p>of Law and author of Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children (Cambridge 2008). A review of Justice<\/p>\n<p>Denied appeared on June 25, 2008. Her previous book is God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University<\/p>\n<p>Press 2005), now available in paperback. Her latest book is Fundamentalism, Politics, and the Law (Palgrave Macmillan 2011)<\/p>\n<p>(co-edited with Mark J. Rozell). Her email is hamilton02@aol.com.<br \/>\n******************************************************************************<\/p>\n<p>* O.K.\u00a0 folks this is my comment as it pertains to April being National Child Abuse Month,well it is more of a question really.<br \/>\nDo you think Child Abuse on any level,be it physical,sexual,mental, should have the protections of the Statute Of Limitations that many other crimes do ?<br \/>\nShould we place those who commit crimes on children in the same legal classification as motor vehicle theft,burglary,and larceny ?<br \/>\nSee because from where I stand,as far as heinous crimes go I do not !<br \/>\nLet me know&#8230;&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Thank You<br \/>\nD.Lemur<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Child Abuse Prevention Month (April 2012) 04\/2012 April was first declared Child Abuse Prevention Month by presidential proclamation in 1983. Since then, April has been a time to acknowledge the importance of families and communities working together to prevent child abuse.\u00a0 In Child Maltreatment 2010 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,10,2,11,1428,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85847","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-friendburst","category-life","category-other","category-people","category-politics-2","category-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85847\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/friendburst.com\/blog-new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}